Why now

Recording became easy. Governing the record did not.

AI agents can join a meeting and produce a summary in minutes. Enterprise teams still need answers to three questions: who agreed, what could be kept, and how can we show what happened?

01
Who was informed, and who agreed?
02
What was permitted to enter the record?
03
What evidence can a reviewer inspect?

Retention is a decision

A transcript is only one possible output. Teams may need the decisions and action items without every aside or identifier. Policy should decide what enters the lasting record as the meeting happens.

Decide what belongs in the record before it becomes one.

Proof needs to travel

A policy page cannot explain a particular meeting. Reviewers need an account of the announcement, permissions, retention decisions, and stop requests for that session. Cull is designed to make those events reviewable.

The opportunity expands

Conversations and field work are the starting point. New applications for operational coordination and live legal decision support are in development. The long-term vision is a reusable layer that helps sensing AI understand context and surface what matters, with permissions shaping what it may process and retain.

Explore the vision →
See the approach
The Cull platform
See how it works